Trust in Medical Publications: The Importance of Good Editing
In an era saturated with information, the need for reliable, trustworthy sources is paramount, especially when it comes to health and medicine. The foundation of evidence-based medicine and evidence based practice rests on the integrity of the medical literature. The journey from a scientific discovery to a published paper is rigorous, and at its core is the critical, often unseen, process of good editing. This meticulous work is essential for maintaining research integrity and ensuring that the findings of clinical trials and clinical research are accurately and clearly communicated to the world.
The Role of Editorial Review in Scientific Communication in an Age of Misinformation
The process that transforms raw medical research into a credible publication is a multi-layered system of quality control. This system is vital for establishing trust in medical publications, especially as the public sphere is increasingly polluted by health misinformation and disinformation on the internet and social media (4, 5).
In this challenging environment, the need for rigorous editorial review is more critical than ever. A cornerstone of this process is peer review, where experts in the field critically evaluate a manuscript’s methodology, significance, and conclusions. However, the work does not end there. Medical editing and editorial review ensure that the language is precise, the data is clearly presented, and the narrative is accessible to its intended audience, whether they are fellow researchers, healthcare professionals, or the public.
Furthermore, the integrity of evidence-based medicine has been challenged by broader attacks on science and the suppression of scientific findings in political contexts (6, 7). This makes the role of the editor a frontline defense for research integrity. Good editing also plays a crucial role in distinguishing between statistical significance and clinical significance. For instance, a randomized clinical trial might show a statistically significant result, but a skilled editor helps ensure the paper clearly discusses the real-world impact—or lack thereof—on healthcare quality. This commitment to clarity and accuracy is central to ethical scientific communication and upholding publication ethics. The editor acts as a crucial filter, protecting the medical literature from the erosion of trust caused by both deliberate disinformation and the political disregard for scientific consensus.
Dr. Barbara Gastel: Guiding the Next Generation of Medical Editors
A leading voice in the field of medical communication and medical writing is Barbara Gastel MD, MPH, a Professor at Texas A&M University (1). Dr. Gastel is a physician specializing in biomedical writing and editing, dedicating her career to improving the quality and clarity of scientific and medical information. Her work directly addresses the challenges of communicating complex medical evidence and evidence synthesis effectively.
A New Guide for the Craft: Medical Editing
Dr. Gastel’s commitment to the profession is crystallized in her new book, “Medical Editing: A Guide to Learning the Craft and Building Your Career” (2). This comprehensive guide is the first of its kind designed to introduce prospective and early-career professionals to this vital specialty.
The book provides accessible and concrete instruction on the entire publishing process, from the punctuation mark to the full publication. It delves into the unique challenges of the field, including working with highly technical medical terminology and navigating ethical issues in medical editing. By covering the full spectrum of the craft, Dr. Gastel’s book serves as an authoritative resource for anyone involved in the creation or dissemination of medical literature, reinforcing the importance of research methodology in every published work.
Cultivating Expertise: The Texas A&M Science and Technology Journalism Program
The future of reliable medical journalism and scientific research hinges on the training of skilled communicators. At Texas A&M University, the master’s degree program in Science & Technology Journalism (STJR), coordinated by Dr. Gastel, is preparing the next generation of writers and editors (3).
This program is designed to bridge the gap between complex scientific and medical fields and effective public understanding. It offers coursework in both science journalism and science, equipping students with the dual expertise necessary to critically evaluate and clearly present medical evidence. Graduates of the STJR program are trained to become the editors and writers who will uphold the standards of publication ethics and research integrity in the future, ensuring that the public and practitioners alike can rely on the medical literature for sound, evidence-based medicine.
References
[1] Texas A&M University Naresh K. Vashisht College of Medicine. Barbara Gastel, MD, MPH.
[4] Yeung, A. W. K. (2022). Medical and Health-Related Misinformation on Social Media. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(1), e28152.
[5] do Nascimento, I. J. B., et al. (2022). Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of the effects on health behaviors and outcomes. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 1689.
[6] Union of Concerned Scientists. (2025). Science and Democracy Under Siege.
[7] Webb, R. M. (2022). How President Trump’s war on science impacted public health. Journal of Public Health Policy, 43(1), 1-12.
[8] Brennan Center for Justice. (2020). Trump Administration Abuses Thwart US Pandemic Response.
[10] Science. (2025). Trump administration quashes NIH scientific integrity policy.
GoToHealth Editorial – Political Interference: Documented Attacks on Scientific Integrity
The challenge to research integrity and evidence-based medicine is not solely a product of social media; it has also been institutionalized through political interference. During the Trump administration, there were numerous documented instances of political pressure and suppression targeting federal science agencies, which directly undermined the public’s trust in medical publications and scientific institutions (6, 7). Specific examples of these attacks include:- Suppression of Public Health Data: Reports from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) were reportedly suppressed, altered, or delayed to align with political narratives, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic (8). This interference directly compromised the ability of public health officials and the public to rely on timely, accurate medical evidence.
- Censorship of Climate Science: The administration engaged in widespread efforts to remove or alter climate change data and information from federal websites, including the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of the Interior (9). This political censorship demonstrated a disregard for established scientific research and scientific communication.
- Undermining Scientific Integrity Policies: The National Institutes of Health (NIH) policy designed to shield federal scientists from political influence was rescinded (10). Such actions eroded the independence of scientists and made it more difficult for them to conduct and publish unbiased medical research.
- Disregard for Expert Findings: Scientific findings, particularly those related to environmental and public health regulations, were frequently suppressed, downplayed, or ignored in favor of deregulation and political expediency (7).
These actions highlight a critical need for robust editorial review and independent medical journalism to serve as a check against the political manipulation of science. The integrity of the publishing process is a vital safeguard for the health and safety of the public.
Listen on Podcast
Did you like your experience?
Please leave us a Testimonial HERE if you have a Google account.
Your word helps get our word out to more people.
Thank you in advance!!
